apa nak jadi...

when i was flipping through the Berita Harian newspaper today, i was shocked by this headline...



again and again... the Israeli had done so many things to the Muslims. previously, have we ever heard before, the israeli had attacked the Chinese or the Hindus? no. or never. but, what makes those people wanted to abolish the Muslims in Gaza so much. the main reason was about the place where the Palestinians live now. the place where so many historical events had taken place. place where the mosque al-Aqsa located. the place where the Israeli (particularly the jews) claimed the place of their place of worshiping was located. the place where the prophet Muhammad s.a.w was being mikraj to the sidratul muntaha.




and now, the Israeli is fighting for the holy place of three main religions, Islam, Christian and jews. but, what makes the situation gone so badly, the Israeli fight for the place by force. they planned any kind of ways to get the place, even if they have to kill people. actually, from ever before, the Israeli were refugees whereby they do not have a country and place to live. because of their bad attitude. and when they succeeded to live in Palestine illegally, they made some "cleaning" process in the country. they seized the land of Palestinians, they killed them, without taking consideration of the elderly or the kids, the men or women. they killed without looking at who was the victims. and now, after more than half a decade, they are still continuing killing people. though hundreds of agreements and "genjatan senjata" had been approved by both parties, the Israeli had never obey that. millions of people had died since they violated the land of Palestine. they also claimed that the Palestinians (Hamas) had disobeyed the "genjatan senjata" first, but the fact was they had firstly attacked the Hamas. if you were attacked or if you were in Hamas's shoes, would you did the same thing?? Hamas fight back for their dignity and their jihad, but the Israeli laknatullah accused them as terrorist.. is that fair?
what makes me very sad about this matter was, the neighbouring countries were not helping the Palestinians, though they are from the same religion.. what on earth the Egypt's prime minister was thinking about the arresting the convoy of Viva Palestina who wants to help the Palestinians. they brought various kinds of helping (foods, medicine, etc..etc..) from various parts of the world. other people realized that problems couldn't be solved through wars and terrorisms. the Egypt should not do that. they shouldn't instruct the convoy to let the army of the israel to pass the help to the palestinians. that was ridiculous. take a look, army who are attacking the Palestine wants to give a help to the victims?? that was impossible man... what a stupid one..



may ALLAH blessed all the martyrs with jannatul firdaus. we pray for the people who confronting the holy religion of Islam and its followers to be destroy with the undefined torment by ALLAH AZZA WAJALLA.. for the all the mujahidin and syahidin,
AL-FATIHAH....

rentetan isu hangat

today, another hot issue was aroused.. all because of the hot current topic regarding the usage of ALLAH'S name among the non-muslims... i was at masjid sultan salahuddin, shah alam this afternoon to perform my solat jumaat.. i admit that it was my first time to perform my solat there. it is a huge mosque i have ever been before. but, that was not the issue. the issue was.. there was groups of non-gevernment organisations (NGOs) such as PERKIM, ABIM, PEPIAS and so on... they been there for collecting signatures on the petition regarding the objection of using the kalimah ALLAH among the non-muslim.. i was there with my friend helping them to collect the jemaah's signatures.. for god sake, it was a quite hard work todo. but, if what i do is in the name of Islam and ALLAH, i bare to sacrifice my own life.



after the one hour hard working, we stopped for a while to perform our solat. actually, it was a quite challenging task for me to "promote" something to people. people may have their own perspective on the issue. so, my job was to attract them to understand what actually had happened in this situation. they must know that this issue was not a playful one because the petition is about to be handed to the palace to be seen by the sultan. Perlembagaan Malaysia had stated that the sultan and kings have the right to protect the dignity of Islam and Malay society. so, from the petition, we had succeeded to collect about a thousand signs from various background of people. from elderly to the small one. all united to second this matter.



after the solat jumaat, we continued our task till the end. after 10 minutes interval, all of the jemaah were asked to assemble at the hall for a speech about the issue. all the panels were so enthusiastic when giving up their speeches. i was there holding the banner in front of the crowd. the panels were explaining on why this issue had to be aroused and why the kalimah shouldn't be used by the non-muslims. it is actually, that it was not wrong if they wanted to use it, but we should be alerted if there is MAYBE a misuse the kalimah. and other points were as the same as in my previous post.







there was one more thing. two churches were set on fire today. this was a bad sign to the society, especially during this time. the issue of the kalimah had no way to be settled yet, all of a sudden, another bad thing added some "spices" to the matter. for me, it was a VERY VERY VERY unreasonable action to be taken. i realized that the MUSLIMS were angry about this issue, but the "irresponsible party" should not make the situation to be a very bad one. this will make the society to accuse the Muslims to be responsible for that. i am not accusing anybody and i am not making any suspicion on any particulars. it just that, the Principe of war in Islam had stated that the places for worshiping are totally forbidden to be destroy. so, any person who did this that should take the responsibilities for what had happened.

nama ALLAH: patutkah atau tidak?

when i was looking through this matter for a couple of minutes, i grinned to myself.. my heart said, "another trick by the Christian to jeopardize the Muslims faith,"
from ever before, the Christian had done so many things, including by spreading tricky "viruses" to ruin every Muslim aqidah.. as we could see now, there are protesting for their right in the name of the PERLEMBAGAAN MALAYSIA which stated that Islam is the official religion of Malaysia. so, they took this opportunity to utter an idea of using the kalimah "ALLAH" in the magazine Herald - The Catholic weekly..
ya ma'asyara muslimun, we are actually nearly to be defeated by the christian in this case when the court had decided to give the permission of using the kalimah (which actually judged by a non-muslim judge). the religion matter shouldn't be brought in civil court, plus it is judged by a non-Muslim which has no relationship and no nothing about Islam.. and all the decision will prone the Christian, and that's for sure.. because civil court judging by following the law of people, not the law of religion.
so, where is our position in placing Islam as the main religion in Malaysia??
the magazine party said that they wanted to use the kalimah for education to people towards Christianity. doesn't that sound weird when you are using others "property" for your own sake????
let me give some explanation... the concept of God in Islam and the concept of God in Christian are two different things.. there is a wide gap between them..
firstly, Islam emphasize its followers to believe to the ONE GOD, which is ALLAH.. there is no more than that.. plus ALLAH is the only one who admin this world, no kids and no parents.. this is what we called as TAUHID...
secondly, in Christian, they have the so-called "rukun iman" which consist of the concept of TRINITY.. trinity means that the Christian believe in three gods... they believe that God is the father of Jesus, and Jesus is the son of the God...
thirdly, are they both same??? in any way also, they will never be the same... Islam proved that ALLAH is the only one in the HOLY QURAN, in the verses in al-ikhlas:3,
"Dia (ALLAH) tidak beranak dan tidak diperanakkan"..

and now... again, are they both same??? so, why is it the magazine wanted so much until this has to be brought to the court just to use the word unless they have something that have been "planned" before... we should realize that it will instantly destroy the aqidah of the Muslims and all at once confusing the society... so, go for jihad and gain some tarbiyah in yourselves..(including me.. :])

AR RUHUL JADID

Arruhul Jadid fi jasadil ummah
Hai mujahid luluh lentakan jiwa pendosa

Kami petualang mencari kebenaran
Mencari makna serta hakikat manusia
Kami berjuang menegakkan kehormatan
Hidup mulia atau mati sebagai syuhada

Kami berbekal al-Quran hakiki
Meneruskan cita dan risalah para nabi
Kami sandang julukan generasi ghuraba
Biar saatnya datang kami pimpin dunia

Kami semangat baru siap maju hancur semua musuh
Kami tentara Allah siap korbankan harta bahkan jiwa

Kami serahkan semua hidup pada Allah
Kami tekadkan tuk ikuti Rasulullah
Usung panji Ilahi iman kuat membaja
Hadapi tirani bebaskan umat dunia

debat profesor ateis dengan pelajar

Seorang atheist yang juga professor falsafah bercerita dalam kuliahnya mengenai masalah yang dihadapi oleh sains berkenaan dengan Tuhan. Dia meminta seorang pelajarnya bangun dan beliau bertanya…

Prof: Kamu percayakan Tuhan?


Pelajar: Sudah semestinya professor.

Prof: Adakah Tuhan itu baik?

Pelajar: Ya

Prof: Adakah Tuhan itu amat berkuasa?

Pelajar: Ya

Prof: Saudara saya meninggal kerana kanser walaupun dia berdoa kepada Tuhan agar dia boleh sembuh. Kebanyakan kita akan cuba membantu mereka yang sedang sakit tetapi Tuhan tidak. Jadi macamana Tuhan itu baik? Hmmm?

(Pelajar berdiam diri)

Prof: Kamu tidak boleh menjawabnya ya? Mari kita teruskan lagi anak muda. Adakah Tuhan baik?

Pelajar: Ya.

Prof: Adakah syaitan baik?

Pelajar: Tidak.

Prof: Siapa yang mencipta syaitan?

Pelajar: Tuhan.

Prof: Tepat sekali, beritahu saya anak muda, wujudkah kejahatan didunia ini?

Pelajar: Ya.

Prof: Kejahatan ada dimana2 bukan? Dan Tuhan mencipta semuanya, betul?

Pelajar: Ya.

Prof: Jadi siapa yang mencipta kejahatan?

(Pelajar tidak menjawab)

Prof: Bukankah terdapat penyakit? Keruntuhan moral? Kebencian? Keburukan? Semua perkara yang dasyat ini wujud didunia ini bukan?

Pelajar: Ya professor.

Prof: Siapa yang menciptanya?

(Pelajar tiada jawapan untuknya)

Prof: Science menyatakan yang kamu ada 5 deria untuk mengenalpasti dan melihat dunia disekeliling kamu, baeritahu saya anak muda, pernahkah kamu melihat Tuhan?

Student: Tidak pernah professor.

Prof: Sila beritahu jika kamu pernah mendengar akan Tuhan itu?

Pelajar: Tidak pernah professor.

Prof: Pernahkah kamu perasankan akan Tuhan itu? rasaiNya, menghiduNya? Adakah pada kamu itu apa2 deria yang boleh membuat kamu kenal akan Tuhan itu?

Pelajar: Tiada professor, saya tidak pernah mengalaminya.

Prof: Dan kamu masih percayakan Tuhan itu?

Pelajar: Ya professor.

Prof: Berdasarkan kepada pemerhatian, pada kajian, pada suatu yang boleh didemonstrasikan, sains menyatakan yang Tuhan itu tidak wujud. Apa pendapat kamu mengenainya?

Pelajar: Saya tidak boleh berkata apa2 professor, saya hanya ada kepercayaan dan keimanan kepada Tuhan itu sendiri.

Prof: Ya.. percaya.. iman, itulah dia masalah yang dihadapi oleh sains.

(Pelajar termenung dan berfikir lantas bersuara..)

Pelajar: Professor, wujudkan apa yang dipanggil panas?

Prof: Ya.

Pelajar: Dan juga apa yang dipanggil sejuk?

Prof: Ya.

Pelajar: Tidak professor, tidak ada sebenarnya apa yang di panggil sejuk itu.

(Semua didalam dewan kuliah terdiam)

Pelajar: Professor, kita boleh ada banyak haba kepanasan, panas yang teramat sangat, yang sedikit atau pun tiada kepanasan. Sebenarnya kita tiada apa yang dipanggil sejuk. Kita boleh mencapai 458 darjah dibawah takat beku tetapi kita tidak boleh pergi rendah daripada itu. Sebenarnya tiada apa yang dipanggil sejuk. Kepanasan itu adalah tenaga, sejuk bukanlah lawan kepada panas, hanya ketiadaan panas itu sendiri.

(Dewan kuliah menjadi sunyi sepi)

Pelajar: Bagaimana pula dengan kegelapan? Adakah wujud apa yang dipanggil gelap itu?

Professor: Apalah malam jika tiada kegelapan?

Pelajar: Sekali lagi professor silap. Kegelapan hanyalah ketiadaan sesuatu. Kita boleh ada cahaya yang malap, cahaya normal, cahaya terang, cahaya berkilau… tetapi jika kita tiada cahaya, itu yang dipanggil kegelapan. Realitinya "gelap" itu tidak wujud. Kita tidak boleh membuatkan gelap itu menjadi semakin bertambah gelap bukan?

Prof: Jadi apa sebenar yang kamu ingin sampaikan disini?

Pelajar: Apa yang saya ingin nyatakan adalah, falsafah professor itu salah.

Prof: Salah? Bolehkah kamu jelaskannya?

Pelajar: Profesor membuat perhitungan menggunakan konsep yang berlawan, antara hidup dan mati, Tuhan yang baik dan tidak. Professor melihat konsep ketuhanan itu pada suatu yang nyata, sesuatu yang boleh kita ukur. Professor, sains masih tidak boleh menjelaskan dari mana datangya "ruh atau nyawa" dan apakah "minda" atau "fikiran" itu sendiri. Sains menggunakan elektrik dan magnetism tetapi ianya suatu yang tidak kelihatan dan nyata, malah kita masih tidak memahaminya secara keseluruhan. Untuk melihat mati itu sebagai lawan kepada kepada hidup adalah sesuatu yang tidak tepat kerana sebenarnya mati tidak wujud sebagai suatu bentuk yang nyata. Mati itu bukan lawan kepada hidup, mati hanyalah ketiadaan apa yang memberi kehidupan itu sendiri iaitu nyawa.

Sekarang beritahu saya professor, adakah kamu mengajar bahawa manusia asalnya dari monyet?

Prof: Jika kamu rujuk kepada proses evolusi semulajadi, ya.

Pelajar: Pernahkah professor melihat evolusi itu sendiri?

(Professor menggeleng kepala dan tersenyum kerana mula merasakan perbincangan ini semakin hebat)

Pelajar: Disebabkan tiada siapa pernah melihat proses evolusi itu sendiri sedang berjalan dan tidak boleh membuktikan yang ianya adalah suatu proses yang berlaku secara berterusan, adakah professor mengajar pendapat professor sahaja? Adakah professor saintis atau penceramah?

(Dewan kuliah menjadi gempar)

Pelajar: Ada tak sesiapa didalam dewan ini pernah melihat otak professor?

(Pelajar lain tertawa)

Pelajar: Ada tak sesiapa yang perasan akan otak professor itu? Rasainya, menghidunya? Saya pasti tiada siapa yang pernah berbuat demikian… jadi berdasarkan kepada pemerhatian, pada kajian, pada suatu yang boleh didemonstrasikan, sains menyatakan yang otak professor tidak wujud. Maaf saya katakan, bagaimana kami semua boleh percayakan kuliah2 professor selama ini?

(Seluruh dewan menjadi senyap.. Professor merenung lama kepada pelajar tersebut)

Prof: Saya rasa kamu semua hanya perlu percayakan kepadanya.

Pelajar: Itulah dia professor, hubungan antara manusia dan Tuhan adalah kepercayaan dan keimanannya dan itulah yang membuatkan kita dan seluruh alam ini hidup dan berfungsi sepertinya.